Indigenous farmworkers throughout California face consistently appalling living conditions and the degree of crowding is truly remarkable. Additionally, some still live in make-shift shelters or without shelter at all.
Most indigenous individuals and families live crowded in apartments or rented houses or trailers. A considerable proportion (about one in ten) lives in barracks, make-shift buildings and vehicles behind houses, and other structures.
Finally, there is a relatively small group who live in the canyons of northern San Diego County and elsewhere in the state outside in caves or in plastic structures.Few indigenous farmworker families own the dwelling they occupy. In our survey (the Indigenous Community Survey) only about one in 10 owned the dwelling they lived in and most of these were trailers. In the bigger, more complete survey done by the Department of Labor called the National Agricultural Workers Survey (NAWS) only one in 25 of Southern Mexicans (most of whom are indigenous) own their home.
Almost all indigenous farmworkers are renters and many live in dwellings where many families and individuals share the rent. In the Indigenous Community Survey, we found that families were paying about $400 a month, while individuals paying rent for just one person were paying about $150 per month. The rents seem to be similar regardless of whether the farmworkers live in houses, apartments or trailers.
Not surprisingly, the rents vary greatly according whether the people live on the coast or in the interior farm regions of California. For example, in our Indigenous Community Survey we found that a typical rent for a family in the coastal areas varied from $400 to $700, while in the Central Valley, indigenous farmworkers pay much more modest rents. They vary from $280 to $350 per month.
The indigenous farmworkers who own their own dwellings are a very small proportion of the overall population and are more likely to reside in the interior regions of the state rather than on the coast.
The level of crowding is severe. The U.S. Census Bureau defines crowdedness by the total number of people sleeping in the dwelling divided by the total number of rooms (excluding the kitchen). If there are more than one and a half people (1.5) per room, the dwelling is considered extremely crowded. In the Indigenous Community Survey, we found the typical dwelling far exceeded this level with 1.75 people per room. Two-thirds of the dwellings fell into this category of extremely crowded. By comparison, for California in general, less than one in ten of the residences are extremely crowded.
It is common to observe three families with young children living in a small two-bedroom apartment with one of the three families sleeping in the living room. In the survey, a large majority of the renters lived jointly with other families. Often times, people live with their married siblings or families share quarters with their parents.
We found this level of crowding regardless of whether the people lived in houses, apartments or trailers. Surprisingly, crowdedness is not much different for the recent arrivals compared to those with lots of time in the United States. Nor does it vary much between families and men living in all-male housing. It appears that among the indigenous farmworker population all types of households live in "severely crowded" circumstances. However, there are places where the condition is even more extreme. The renters who live along the coast suffer the worse conditions. In the chart below notice that all the coastal regions have much higher levels of crowding than in Bakersfield and Fresno. In Watsonville, the crowding reaches the extraordinary level of 3.0 people per room.
Finally, we found that a big proportion of people are sleeping outside of the bedrooms. In the Indigenous Community Survey, about one person in five slept in a room other than a bedroom mostly in living rooms and in garages.
The indigenous we interviewed for the Indigenous Community Survey had lots of complaints about their living conditions. Despite the fact that many seemed shy about complaining, two out of five listed one or more specific complaint.
One can see in the chart below that the main problem is lack of heating or air conditioning. Next in importance is a leaking roof. Third in significance are plumbing problems followed by people who say that their appliances are not working. Many complained of rats and insect infestation, and many reported that the landlord was inattentive to their complaints (see the chart, below).
Our research team recorded observations during their interviews that give a feeling for the living conditions endured by indigenous immigrants. For example, in Watsonville and Salinas where we recorded the highest rates of crowding, our researchers noted the following:
In Watsonville (Pájaro and Lomas) and Salinas we began interviewing families who live in garages or in small rooms without a kitchen, without a bathroom, without heat and with a single bulb for lighting. These families had to ask permission to use the bathroom and the kitchen, and only according to a set schedule.
We were struck by the lack of material possessions among the families from San Martín Peras. We met families who offered us the only plastic chair they possessed. In that house our interviewer had to conduct the interview while seated on a clothes basket and the interpreter sat on a plastic bucket. The family sat on the floor.
In the crowded Ventura region, our researchers recorded this observation:
In Santa Paula and in Fillmore, in almost all the apartments where we conducted interviews we found several families or several single men living in the same apartment. The families rent a room and the single men rent space on the living room floor.
In Santa Maria interviewers noted the following extreme situation:
We interviewed a woman last night who lived in an ordinary-looking 1930s suburban house with a detached garage in back. She informed us that in addition to herself and her two young daughters there were another 38 people living at the address. There were 19 kids, 16 solo males (10 living in the garage), plus 6 women and only one bathroom. The men bathe in back with the garden hose.
Finally, in the Bakersfield region, interviewers observed the following conditions:
While in Taft I interviewed a woman and noted cockroaches moving about on the floor and on the wall behind her. No one mentioned them, nor made any complaints about the apartment. There are three couples living in the apartment. Two couples sleep in the bedroom upstairs and the third couple sleeps in the living room.
We realized there was fear we would discover how many people are living in a house, apartment, and room or garage because people are afraid that if it’s known, someone might come to evict them, i.e. the owner, the manager, the city or some other authority. We were able to speak with the owner of some apartments who told us that he’s found up to 15 people living in a single apartment, but “for security and for their own good” he’s established a rule of a maximum of 10 per apartment.